In-Person Versus Virtual Instruction and Simulation for Unplanned Out-of-Hospital Births

INTRODUCTION: Unplanned out-of-hospital births are uncommon and associated with serious complications. Most emergency medical services (EMS) personnel receive little or no instruction on emergent vaginal delivery. Our in-person (IP) lecture and simulation training on emergent vaginal delivery for EMS personnel previously demonstrated improvement in knowledge and confidence. With COVID-19 we adapted the same curriculum into a virtual training session (VTS). In-person simulation increases confidence and knowledge, but less is known about virtual simulation training. The purpose of this study was to assess EMS personnel's knowledge and confidence after IP versus VTS in emergent vaginal delivery. METHODS: The IP and VTS participants received the same lecture on emergent delivery either in-person or virtually. The IP group received in-person simulation training using a birth simulator. The VTS group received simulation training via virtual demonstration on the same model. Participants completed pretraining and posttraining surveys to assess knowledge and confidence. Responses were analyzed and compared using Student's t test. RESULTS: Ninety-eight participants (59 IP, 39 VTS) participated with 100% survey completion. Pretraining knowledge scores were similar (IP 45% versus VTS 37%, P =.22). Although both groups showed improvement, the IP group had significantly higher posttraining knowledge scores (IP 99% versus VTS 75%, P <.01). More IP participants reported confidence in performing emergent delivery after training (IP 100% versus VTS 51%, P <.01). CONCLUSION: Live in-person instruction and simulation training of emergent vaginal delivery among EMS personnel results in higher knowledge scores and confidence when compared to virtual instruction and simulation training. Further evaluation is needed to determine generalizability to other learner groups. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Elective Procedures in Obstetrics and Gynecology During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has stressed healthcare systems in the United States and globally. Limited hospital resources, increasing patient surge, and growing demands on healthcare providers have led to the United States Surgeon General and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services calling for suspension of all nonessential adult elective surgery and medical procedures. As of March 27, 2020, 30 states had issued similar declarations related to elective procedures in the setting of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic. Two major questions have emerged as these events have unfolded: (1) What is the definition of an “elective” procedure? and (2) Are there specialty-specific considerations for obstetric and gynecologic procedures? This article provides insights into each of these questions and provides a working framework for obstetrician/gynecologists to advocate for their patients and coordinate with their hospital systems to develop “elective” procedure guidelines that incorporate considerations for women’s and maternal health.